AT&T May Drop Dish, But Still Has U-verse

Stacey Higginbotham, Wednesday, July 2, 2008 at 12:43 PM PT Comments (8)

AT&T has decided not to renew its contract to resell television services provided by Dish Networks. The announcement, made last night in a filing from Dish with the SEC, have sent shares of the satellite company tumbling and analysts rushing to point out that this may not be the end for Dish and AT&T. My question is, why not? Where the heck is AT&T’s belated IPTV service?

Several analysts said that AT&T’s refusal to automatically renew the five-year-old contract means the telco will try to negotiate a better deal by bringing Dish rival DirectTV to the table. Others say this kills any hope that AT&T might buy Dish. But Dish has been a stopgap measure to give AT&T a triple play of voice, data and video as the cable guys encroached on the voice business. AT&T has always wanted to offer its own video service.

Six years ago I sat through demos of AT&T’s Project Lightspeed (now Homezone) and marveled at the coming television service options ahead. By that measure I’ve spent a fifth of my life waiting for U-verse as it worked through technical hurdles and issues with the Microsoft platform. And only now is the service getting widely rolled out. Dare I hope that AT&T is actually getting close to owning its own triple play?

Right now, according to an emailed response from an AT&T spokesman, “U-verse TV is our primary offering in the areas where it is available, but AT&T | DISH is available across our footprint.” As U-verse expands, losing the AT&T contract may not be such a blow.

Rating: 53% Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
Print

8 comments so far

July 2nd, 2008
4:29 PM PT

Just hope that the fiber line to your building doesn’t get cut or you’ll wait 4 weeks for them to fix it because they are arguing with the condo builder over the 20k cost to fix said line. They can’t be spliced like cable lines. We finally got Insight.

July 2nd, 2008
9:29 PM PT
Pat Hurley said:

I think your perspective on this Stacey is 100% out of sync with mine because you’re (as it mentions in this post (http://gigaom.com/2008/02/19/waiting-for-u-verse-in-austin/) still waiting for uVerse , while for me I’ve already been there (and left).

While I am a bit surprised that AT&T chose this moment to move on from the DISH partnership (if in fact that have moved on…), but from where I sit in a uVerse territory (for at least a year here in San Diego), it’s obvious that AT&T has moved on to uVerse.

I’m talking from a consumer, not analyst, perspective here… they saturate the airwaves with commercials for “advanced TV”, they have an army of contractors going door-to-door selling the service, etc.

Now if only they had made the technology choice Verizon made, they wouldn’t have people like me (and several neighbors) dropping them because they can’t support two HD streams to the whole house (though I hear they’ve got that problem licked — but two’s STILL not enough for anyone with a DVR and more than one HDTV)…

July 2nd, 2008
9:57 PM PT
Eideard said:

In my neck of the prairie, AT&T is still partnered with DirecTV, offering DSL as the broadband [sic] part of the package. Which means, on my road, 1.25mbps.

July 2nd, 2008
11:14 PM PT
George said:

ATT U-Verse recently started a heavy rotation ad campaign featuring Billy Dee WIlliams. Don’t know if its LA only or nationwide.

July 3rd, 2008
10:06 AM PT
Stacey Higginbotham said:

Pat, I would take FiOS (I think) over U-verse any day. But I would try U-verse over Time Warner right away. I mostly want the option, but AT&T won’t give it to me (even though they are in other parts of Austin). And until they do I don’t even get the option of faster Time Warner Service because they’re busy offering those infrastructure upgrades in area where AT&T is providing U-Verse. It’s a duopoly downer, believe me.

July 3rd, 2008
3:11 PM PT
Carmen said:

AT & T is supremely bootleg. I want Verizon. Too bad I live in Atlanta!!

July 3rd, 2008
4:46 PM PT
Pat Hurley said:

I feel your pain Stacey — as someone who left (sorta, I never turned it off, but thought about it) Time Warner to go to U-Verse and then went back again. And yeah, Time Warner has been busily increasing our download speeds and adding HD channels (not as many as U-Verse or DIRECTV, but getting there) since AT&T rode into town with the U-Verse offer.

Now if only TWC can keep pushing ATT to offer more SIMULTANEOUS HD channels, and ATT can keep pushing TWC to offer more TOTAL HD channels, we’ll see some competitive benefits from the duopoly :)

July 6th, 2008
8:12 AM PT
Justin Haygood said:

AT&T recently started offering AT&T Dish Network service in Atlanta (via bellsouth.com).

Leave a Comment

Get the comments RSS feed, instant notification of new comments

Most Comments

Mozilla Not Worried About Google Browser
Om Malik, September 1, 77 comments
Why is Google Releasing a Browser?
Om Malik, September 1, 61 comments
Joost To Kill Desktop Client
Om Malik, September 5, 52 comments
Why Did Google Abandon Firefox?
Liz Gannes, September 2, 50 comments
Google Browser Puts the Cloud To Work
Om Malik, September 2, 40 comments

Highest Rated

Why Did Google Abandon Firefox?
Liz Gannes, September 2, 61%
Coming Soon: PC-as-a-Service over Broadband
Allan Leinwand, August 30, 75%
Google Browser Puts the Cloud To Work
Om Malik, September 2, 62%
Carbonite CEO: Online Backups Sell
Om Malik, August 31, 64%
A Quick Guide to Netbooks
Kevin C. Tofel, September 1, 56%
Close
E-mail It