Privacy Wins Some, Loses Some

Stacey Higginbotham, Monday, April 14, 2008 at 8:00 PM PT Comments (4)

A European legal body has declared that ISPs who employ ad-serving technology from Phorm must do so on an opt-in basis, or risk violating UK and EU data protection laws. The move follows several months of controversy over the startup’s plans to broadly track the surfing habits of users and serve ads against them. While the system doesn’t seem terribly insidious, it is something that could quickly infringe privacy without setting off alarms.

It’s an issue another stateside company seeking to target ads to web users based on their surfing habits — NebuAd — is dealing with as well. And the proliferation of such companies is getting the attention of the FTC, which on Friday closed the public comment period related to regulating behavioral advertising. Unsurprisingly, industry members wanted less regulatory oversight; privacy groups, on the other hand, asked for less data retention, more transparency about data collection practices, and for such advertising to be done on an opt-in basis so that consumers are made aware that their web usage is being mined for advertising.

However, in this era of governments spying on citizens combined with the need to monetize all these nifty free online services through advertising, it’s unlikely that the FTC will get too heavy with the regulations. The demands of national security and Internet commerce are conspiring against privacy, and the consumer seems to be getting short shrift.

Rating: 53% Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
Print

1 trackback so far

August 1st, 2008
10:11 PM PT

[...] packet inspection for advertising: Charter Communications, Embarq and others had signed up with a startup called NebuAd that inserted [...]

3 comments so far

April 15th, 2008
7:48 AM PT
Kevin Horne said:

The consumer doesn’t get “short shrift.” The Internet is a commercial venture. You pay to get on, and you either pay for content or support it via advertising.

And every night, thousands of people take their laptops out onto the street containing consumers’ social security numbers, etc. And no one blinks.

The paranoia surrounding this issue boggles the mind.

April 15th, 2008
7:51 AM PT
Kevin Horne said:

The consumer doesn’t get “short shrift.” The Internet is a commercial venture. You pay to get access, and you pay for the content or support it by consuming advertisements.

Every night thousands of workers carry laptops into the streets bearing consumers’ social security numbers, etc. Yet people want the government to block ISPs et al. from tracking nonidentifying information.

The paranoia boggles the mind.

April 15th, 2008
4:47 PM PT
Oar Wellin said:

‘While the system doesn’t seem terribly insidious’

choke

Being wire tapped at your ISP not insidious?

Your whole click stream ripped off and sold?

What does it take to make you use the word ‘insidious’ about the web Stacey?

Leave a Comment

Get the comments RSS feed, instant notification of new comments

Most Comments

iPhone 3G Issues: The Plot Thickens
Om Malik, August 14, 52 comments
Why Blogs Need To Be Social
Om Malik, August 14, 51 comments
How Do You Rate NBC’s Olympics?
Om Malik, August 17, 44 comments
Why The MMORPG Subscription-Based Business Model Is Broken
Wagner James Au, August 16, 28 comments
Open Thread: Are You Happy With Apple Support?
Om Malik, August 18, 24 comments

Highest Rated

F|R: How to Avoid Feature Creep with Your Software Apps
Jason Putorti, August 17, 76%
Top 5 Reasons Business Execs Fail to Work Effectively with Product and Engineering Execs
Kevin Fortuna and Marty Abbott, August 16, 70%
Missing Muxtape? Try 8Tracks. It’s Better
Om Malik, August 19, 78%
Meet GigaLogue, Roll Your Own NewsFeeds
Om Malik, August 18, 60%
Why Blogs Need To Be Social
Om Malik, August 14, 59%
Close
E-mail It